Papers with pooling strategies

10 papers
Mind Your Special Tokens! On the Importance of Dedicated Sequence-End Tokens in Vision-Language Embedding Models (2026.eacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are highly sensitive to end-of-input artifacts in fine-tuning and inference data, e.g., whether input sequences end with punctuation or newline characters.
Approach: They propose to convert generative LVLMs into vision-language encoders via contrastive learning objectives and use supervised contrastive objectives to train them.
Outcome: The proposed approach improves visual and text representations and improves retrieval and (semantic) similarity tasks.
From Ambiguity to Accuracy: The Transformative Effect of Coreference Resolution on Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems (2025.acl-srw)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a key framework in natural language processing . however, the effectiveness of RAG is often hindered by coreferential complexity in retrieved documents .
Approach: They investigate how entity coreference affects document retrieval and generative performance in RAG-based systems.
Outcome: The proposed model improves QA performance and retrieval relevance and contextual understanding.
Baseline Needs More Love: On Simple Word-Embedding-Based Models and Associated Pooling Mechanisms (P18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing deep learning architectures to model compositionality in text sequences require a large number of parameters and expensive computations.
Approach: They propose two additional pooling strategies over word embeddings for improved interpretability and hierarchical pooling for spatial (n-gram) information within text sequences.
Outcome: The proposed pooling strategies improve interpretability and preserve spatial (n-gram) information within text sequences.
Don’t be a Fool: Pooling Strategies in Offensive Language Detection from User-Intended Adversarial Attacks (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Offensive language detection is important for filtering out abusive expressions, authors argue . authors propose user-intended adversarial attacks that insert special symbols or leverage distinctive features of the Korean language.
Approach: They propose user-intended adversarial attacks that insert special symbols or leverage the distinctive features of the Korean language.
Outcome: The proposed models are more robust to performance degradation even when the attack rate is increased, compared to models trained on noisy texts.
On The Performance of Time-Pooling Strategies for End-to-End Spoken Language Identification (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Language identification (LID) from speech is commonly tackled using similar approaches to those employed for speaker verification/recognition.
Approach: They propose to combine local descriptors and global descriptores into a single global description that can be used for downstream classification tasks.
Outcome: The proposed methods outperform well-known benchmark systems and previously results based on attention only.
Less Mature is More Adaptable for Sentence-level Language Modeling (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies fine-tune encoders or contrastive learning approaches to learn sentence representations.
Approach: They propose to use sentence-level models to study how sentence representations influence downstream task performance.
Outcome: The proposed models outperform token-level models in terms of time and data efficiency.
Enhancing Lexicon-Based Text Embeddings with Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance on general-purpose text embedding tasks.
Approach: They introduce the first lexicon-based embeddings that consolidates the vocabulary space through token embeddation clustering to handle the issue of token redundancy in LLM vocabularies.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms dense embeddings on the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB) it also supports efficient dimension pruning without any specialized objectives like Matryoshka Representation Learning.
Investigating Multi-layer Representations for Dense Passage Retrieval (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Dense retrieval models adopt vectors from the last hidden layer of the document encoder to represent a document, which is in contrast to the fact that representations in different layers of a pre-trained language model contain different kinds of linguistic knowledge and behave differently during fine-tuning.
Approach: They propose to utilize representations from multiple encoder layers to make up the representation of a document, which they denote Multi-layer Representations (MLR).
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms dual encoder, ME-BERT and ColBERT in the single-vector retrieval setting and with other advanced training techniques.
Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and Transferability (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) provide potential for uncovering structured, human-interpretable representations in Large Language Models (LLMs).
Approach: They analyze SAEs for interpretable feature extraction from Large Language Models in safety-critical classification tasks.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms hidden-state and BoW models while demonstrating cross-lingual toxicity detection and visual classification tasks.
Beyond Single Representations: Multi-Model Embedding Fusion for Stable Text Classification (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on embedding fusion have not evaluated the effectiveness of individual layers or the impact of combining embeddables from multiple models.
Approach: They propose to combine embeddings from multiple models to improve performance across NLP tasks.
Outcome: The proposed method improves performance on low-resource datasets and reduces the impact of any single model as the number of integrated models increases.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations